{"id":"W2010003290","doi":"10.1016/j.susc.2005.01.062","title":"An XPS round robin investigation on analysis of wood pulp fibres and filter paper","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Surface Science","topic":"Cultural Heritage Materials Analysis","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":58,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières","funders":"Tekes","keywords":"X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy; Filter paper; Pulp (tooth); Round robin test; Reproducibility; Materials science; Computer science; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Pulp and paper industry; Chemistry; Mathematics; Chromatography; Dentistry; Chemical engineering; Engineering; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003730068,0.000337426,0.0003262671,0.0004401378,0.001334972,0.0004254076,0.0004877841,0.0009102481,0.003454689],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004648724,0.0002053908,0.0003723889,0.0003562725,0.0003018965,0.0005814424,0.0003056268,0.0004959572,0.0004475155],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002755911,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002853704,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001873121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003012293,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997073,0.00003359718,0.000009399905,0.00005608052,0.0001351145,0.00005849961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997569,0.00006080374,0.00001432,0.00002305331,0.0001247533,0.0000202031],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002914082,0.00003134107,0.0007117345,0.00007375222,0.00001680183,0.0003136717,0.0002562126,0.00005672148,0.9929011,0.0001140783,0.0002321218,0.005001071],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000009607028,0.000508228,0.017387,0.00000902829,0.00003327011,0.001029095,0.0005599312,0.0005359323,0.9748761,0.0001047043,0.004936465,0.00001062991],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9864351,0.0007594776,0.005969508,0.000121079,0.00006693407,0.00005248738,0.000228231,0.00008620963,0.006281033],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9820461,0.0005891604,0.00586506,0.0001788692,0.00003165568,0.00002665805,0.0004122083,0.00008352115,0.01076682],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.003454689,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0115571,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0426069231436537,"score_gpt":0.2515372980746952,"score_spread":0.2089303749310414,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}