{"id":"W2010043128","doi":"10.1023/a:1012888715007","title":"Eyewitness accuracy rates in sequential and simultaneous lineup presentations: A meta-analytic comparison.","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Law and Human Behavior","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":313,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Eyewitness identification; Moderation; Legal psychology; Identification (biology); Social psychology; Presentation (obstetrics); Statistics; Cognitive psychology; Data mining; Relation (database); Computer science; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02876906,0.0009659771,0.004029112,0.005058525,0.000317192,0.002041928,0.001617752,0.001381406,0.001470484],"category_scores_gemma":[0.106709,0.0009068474,0.008217819,0.005106255,0.0008053493,0.0018693,0.0009803893,0.0009739315,0.0002206752],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009286233,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000923134,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002225428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003437231,"domain_scores_codex":[0.977882,0.0126287,0.004315884,0.002219675,0.002781744,0.0001719675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8724185,0.1053375,0.01470378,0.002732515,0.004362406,0.000445358],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.007727431,0.0002069949,0.09646827,0.194141,0.5399486,0.0002655848,0.00149568,0.0004397116,0.0005004494,0.0003343369,0.00180162,0.1566702],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002564772,0.002296597,0.1307599,0.03119955,0.820876,0.0008798125,0.0009745279,0.000611272,0.001364012,0.001004754,0.007358136,0.0001105817],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.04735105,0.9493665,0.001210229,0.0003284329,0.0001800653,0.0002408874,0.0005683061,0.00002748711,0.0007271419],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6136484,0.3808793,0.002583872,0.0005215245,0.0001998589,0.0008403571,0.0009752581,0.00003731234,0.0003141495],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9712309,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1521472,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2669394264122916,"score_gpt":0.5097878699038276,"score_spread":0.2428484434915361,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}