{"id":"W2010058676","doi":"10.1139/x08-140","title":"Standardized approaches in effectiveness monitoring programs and regional relevance: lessons from the Bowron River Watershed Riparian Evaluation Project","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Government of British Columbia","funders":"Ministry of Environment; Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations; Natural Resources Canada; U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Riparian zone; Watershed; Environmental science; Hydrology (agriculture); Forestry; Geography; Ecology; Habitat; Computer science; Geology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.2701305,0.001064578,0.001400693,0.006147375,0.002018916,0.006064614,0.006019164,0.001984973,0.00231486],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2645637,0.001030017,0.0009634239,0.006768661,0.004655795,0.006765053,0.008379681,0.005093894,0.000430835],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0164224,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04864708,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1226553,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1375014,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8263485,0.1248362,0.01248129,0.004457573,0.02949064,0.002385787],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7256259,0.13146,0.01958513,0.02690733,0.08851094,0.007910782],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004587301,0.001700126,0.1014514,0.001180865,0.0003333591,0.0003666935,0.005878333,0.01324356,0.0007740321,0.02437324,0.0250816,0.8251581],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001975401,0.007129285,0.6938931,0.006882368,0.000636247,0.0005549553,0.02193693,0.04814883,0.004420118,0.08204541,0.1316872,0.0006901253],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.311506,0.02309705,0.4215525,0.1143333,0.001408682,0.02773876,0.00438843,0.002385328,0.09358988],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.528765,0.00739904,0.4320545,0.005636892,0.0004473351,0.01847125,0.002188992,0.0006645122,0.004372542],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8773447,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.900059,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1822495209350425,"score_gpt":0.3513050251076713,"score_spread":0.1690555041726288,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}