{"id":"W2010102977","doi":"10.1021/es8005207","title":"Low Cost Monitoring of Glyphosate in Surface Waters Using the ELISA Method: An Evaluation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Science & Technology","topic":"Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":120,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science; Surface water; Glyphosate; Water quality; Pesticide; Contamination; Environmental chemistry; Sampling (signal processing); Aquatic ecosystem; Hydrology (agriculture); Chemistry; Environmental engineering; Agronomy; Ecology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00284424,0.0009708192,0.0004364902,0.0009374718,0.00041181,0.0008817867,0.001355713,0.0009733254,0.0007020764],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002284792,0.0003417742,0.0004844432,0.0008307929,0.0005360743,0.0006151898,0.0005504009,0.0003622865,0.0004063399],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001908824,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00118954,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01766921,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03129891,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9958844,0.001068475,0.0001110724,0.0003123266,0.00248734,0.0001362553],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976948,0.0004656291,0.0002421485,0.0001195563,0.001381641,0.00009618903],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008897091,0.0008296255,0.0525184,0.0009682411,0.0001815328,0.0004636236,0.0002755282,0.003381367,0.8356627,0.0002694065,0.0009146418,0.1036454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001730846,0.008642811,0.1016124,0.000105431,0.0004844987,0.001935752,0.0008073194,0.05473994,0.8186598,0.0001733298,0.01254721,0.0001183624],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9309075,0.006020449,0.05661904,0.0007508328,0.0001063105,0.00118717,0.0008249408,0.0003444113,0.003239293],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8794555,0.007370418,0.1059476,0.000300198,0.00008897372,0.000631709,0.0008968242,0.00004633697,0.005262332],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01766921,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03513271,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03777878085099349,"score_gpt":0.3051157692999696,"score_spread":0.2673369884489761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}