{"id":"W2010102977","doi":"10.1021/es8005207","title":"Low Cost Monitoring of Glyphosate in Surface Waters Using the ELISA Method: An Evaluation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Science & Technology","topic":"Pesticide and Herbicide Environmental Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":120,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministry of the Environment, Conservation and Parks","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental science; Surface water; Glyphosate; Water quality; Pesticide; Contamination; Environmental chemistry; Sampling (signal processing); Aquatic ecosystem; Hydrology (agriculture); Chemistry; Environmental engineering; Agronomy; Ecology; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001328498,0.0002245178,0.0002425023,0.0001516564,0.0006432579,0.00001212638,0.0008255704,0.0001089297,0.0006285082],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004062009,0.0001753998,0.00004317478,0.0009928696,0.004551522,0.0005943435,0.0007541359,0.0002489268,0.00007737184],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001361033,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002185547,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0008514068,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00003746747,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9972991,0.0001125469,0.0003779486,0.0006312341,0.0009705755,0.0006085497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991802,0.00004258235,0.0001681776,0.0005158283,0.000003029716,0.00009020894],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006619167,0.00009697376,0.4636127,7.206772e-7,0.000002417406,0.000006206576,0.0005799516,0.03790149,0.4925249,0.000004778886,0.000002048807,0.00526119],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000291869,0.00007682808,0.5820166,0.00001160238,0.00001485558,0.00004731971,0.001985194,0.006561602,0.4084889,0.0002246716,0.00009604105,0.0001844605],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9981285,0.0001115852,0.0005736418,0.0001462492,0.0001173772,0.000550179,0.000004735538,0.00003129881,0.0003363963],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.991595,0.0001163479,0.008157293,0.00003641103,0.00001409916,0.00003337839,0.000002048118,0.00001508916,0.00003032017],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1184039,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981575,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03777878085099349,"score_gpt":0.3051157692999696,"score_spread":0.2673369884489761,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}