{"id":"W2010226369","doi":"10.1021/es0514085","title":"Screening Level Risk Assessment Model for Chemical Fate and Effects in the Environment","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Science & Technology","topic":"Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":143,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Golder Associates (Canada); Trent University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Procter and Gamble","keywords":"Risk assessment; Environmental science; Bioaccumulation; Wildlife; Environmental risk assessment; Risk model; Risk analysis (engineering); Biochemical engineering; Computer science; Environmental chemistry; Ecology; Chemistry; Biology; Engineering; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001190804,0.0003348197,0.0002860471,0.0002379543,0.0008486095,0.00004633707,0.000924087,0.0003046221,0.0001994872],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003370301,0.0002741176,0.00006908932,0.0004795644,0.005238853,0.0003663872,0.0009183459,0.000523939,0.00006919905],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006695971,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001055884,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004349579,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005548987,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970393,0.00008298876,0.000389203,0.001040508,0.0004767806,0.0009712149],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990297,0.0001791458,0.0001763045,0.0005172723,6.698761e-7,0.00009689337],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002772846,0.0007468337,0.397417,0.000006594148,0.000009002486,0.00002041419,0.0002519126,0.02652228,0.5559009,0.001907781,0.0002807391,0.01690872],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002949108,0.0006771919,0.6578113,0.00001482163,0.00008059065,0.0001229932,0.0006781688,0.2081737,0.07657383,0.04847316,0.003447483,0.000997695],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.962993,0.00007788178,0.03340328,0.0008771643,0.0000514023,0.001142615,0.00003543635,0.00004908451,0.001370162],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9644451,0.00005496066,0.03413561,0.0004775417,0.00001922117,0.0005432499,0.00001243544,0.00002230065,0.000289637],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4793271,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999711,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01022997695451567,"score_gpt":0.2343218426612017,"score_spread":0.2240918657066861,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}