{"id":"W2010268170","doi":"10.1016/s0147-5967(03)00055-6","title":"A study of the R&D efficiency and productivity of Chinese firms","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Comparative Economics","topic":"Firm Innovation and Growth","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":264,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Productivity; Business; State ownership; Stock (firearms); State owned; R&D intensity; Variance (accounting); Sample (material); Secondary sector of the economy; Productive efficiency; Economics; Market economy; Economy; Microeconomics; Finance; Production (economics); Economic growth; Emerging markets; Accounting","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001304996,0.0003638652,0.000440735,0.004464091,0.0009542188,0.00137181,0.0006508504,0.0004936325,0.002282445],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003571383,0.0002959729,0.0007804567,0.006107077,0.001051788,0.001224469,0.000585179,0.0003631173,0.0001762272],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003955522,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003156265,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.08585159,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05559099,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994942,0.00008964432,0.00005058817,0.0001071428,0.0001067896,0.0001515732],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9954465,0.002705208,0.0007639244,0.0002160798,0.0004816401,0.0003865784],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001884199,0.0001535747,0.9695237,0.0001032107,0.000249637,0.0007603831,0.002208895,0.003023661,0.002180991,0.004939638,0.0003653642,0.01630258],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001071933,0.00006886409,0.9952024,0.000009628951,0.0000952541,0.00009514135,0.0005746079,0.002429539,0.0004149528,0.0004602435,0.0006257154,0.00001294709],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9978489,0.0004656311,0.0001107922,0.00007121455,0.000001744902,0.000005330792,0.000103049,0.000002881825,0.001390474],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992568,0.0001969364,0.00005622572,0.00001379793,0.000006078206,0.000002457551,0.0001320562,0.000001072045,0.0003344935],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08585159,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1707037,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06677939361964665,"score_gpt":0.2781768229568923,"score_spread":0.2113974293372456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}