{"id":"W2010276827","doi":"10.1115/icmm2005-75210","title":"Evaluation of Continuum Mechanics for Electroosmotic Flow in Nanosize Structures","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Nanopore and Nanochannel Transport Studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Nanofluidics; Mechanics; Boundary value problem; Field (mathematics); Transport phenomena; Electrowetting; Biochip; Boltzmann equation; Electro-osmosis; Flow control (data); Flow (mathematics); Materials science; Nanotechnology; Physics; Computer science; Chemistry; Thermodynamics; Optoelectronics; Dielectric; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007186497,0.0004750286,0.0004021775,0.001048851,0.0007715494,0.001280098,0.0007654958,0.001239372,0.002295309],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002882414,0.0002883985,0.0005422186,0.0003712329,0.00138558,0.001094711,0.0008914936,0.0006864,0.0003022838],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001159889,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001012551,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003237848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001396648,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997507,0.0000820331,0.000008871208,0.00002348088,0.0001031126,0.00003192701],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992254,0.0004912195,0.00006620208,0.0000384356,0.0001093043,0.00006938799],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005840621,0.000123256,0.001441975,0.00009120246,0.00002030125,0.0002497186,0.0001136631,0.7798834,0.006795099,0.2023983,0.0005888618,0.008235787],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000005675943,0.000008091566,0.0001080133,0.000002984111,7.49994e-7,0.00001218778,0.00000717243,0.9918314,0.0002397625,0.007584774,0.0001949102,0.000004320386],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3748529,0.001857626,0.5771006,0.001706009,0.0002419825,0.0002637822,0.0001644002,0.0003619459,0.04345073],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9503118,0.0007399973,0.04006985,0.0001600846,0.00009177995,0.0002581599,0.00009133011,0.0001142486,0.008162657],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003237848,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.008415639,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01862740278702753,"score_gpt":0.2440395525190738,"score_spread":0.2254121497320462,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}