{"id":"W2010293399","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2009.02.020","title":"Assessing proarrhythmic potential of drugs when optimal studies are infeasible","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"American Heart Journal","topic":"Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias","field":"Medicine","cited_by":84,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Health Canada","funders":"Health Canada","keywords":"Medicine; QT interval; Guideline; Intensive care medicine; Harmonization; Risk analysis (engineering); Drug; Risk assessment; Clinical Practice; Pharmacology; Internal medicine; Pathology; Family medicine; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004726821,0.0004758749,0.004559955,0.0004176941,0.0002279363,0.0000519097,0.000113103,0.000171379,0.00004726811],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001972751,0.0003495083,0.001624049,0.0004194889,0.0005791236,0.000184605,0.00007166043,0.001661522,0.00003057541],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002288276,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001223959,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007325888,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":2.269881e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997157,0.0004911825,0.0009903734,0.0003746811,0.0004293844,0.0005573371],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975508,0.0001768516,0.001351246,0.0003574529,0.0003309448,0.0002327147],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006709948,0.00008613682,0.00002420412,0.002463032,0.001386894,0.001157778,0.0001576726,0.00002022445,0.00004321878,0.000004070252,0.004522554,0.9900671],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0009934579,0.002827836,0.00104052,0.04416969,0.007274009,0.09601078,0.001835983,0.00001004642,0.00002886789,0.0001376358,0.8447301,0.0009410373],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.008077031,0.9904188,0.00003568013,0.0004712036,0.0003296277,0.0004768601,0.0000068646,0.00003474017,0.0001491928],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.002292304,0.9907367,0.003875013,0.0003168686,0.00251482,0.00001817604,0.00001231137,0.00005924076,0.0001745496],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9891261,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998957,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05656590405462242,"score_gpt":0.4011504042558789,"score_spread":0.3445845002012565,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}