{"id":"W2010304830","doi":"10.1142/s0218488508005650","title":"CALIBRATING FUNCTION POINT BACKFIRING CONVERSION RATIOS USING NEURO-FUZZY TECHNIQUE","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Uncertainty Fuzziness and Knowledge-Based Systems","topic":"Software Engineering Research","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Western University","funders":"","keywords":"Margin (machine learning); Fuzzy logic; Metric (unit); Computer science; Software; Calibration; Point (geometry); Artificial neural network; Sizing; Code (set theory); Algorithm; Machine learning; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Statistics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002541279,0.0008045155,0.0005841723,0.001861207,0.0005241046,0.001537979,0.001139447,0.001014673,0.0009192422],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01188969,0.0004607741,0.0004940964,0.001085938,0.0004588123,0.001314728,0.0006222617,0.0008695546,0.0003767741],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00130878,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001040571,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01043354,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007240646,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984192,0.0004225268,0.00009119189,0.0003044877,0.0006819251,0.00008079754],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9969847,0.001084477,0.0003738704,0.0004137293,0.001114311,0.00002886589],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001781381,0.0001436754,0.007560709,0.0001074341,0.00006749285,0.0001394988,0.0004428213,0.7716165,0.01287208,0.00538083,0.0009865905,0.2005043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001193592,0.00004699079,0.001837303,0.00002079615,0.00001767237,0.00003654324,0.0000729193,0.9853665,0.01016808,0.001753209,0.0006414696,0.00002657267],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1618611,0.0001328711,0.8304767,0.0001363267,0.00004372257,0.0001104547,0.00006653659,0.001235349,0.005936912],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8556797,0.00007934191,0.1432286,0.00002883885,0.00000560647,0.00005993532,0.00006515629,0.00005303456,0.0007996805],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01043354,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02074564,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02986326649931817,"score_gpt":0.2729600884282638,"score_spread":0.2430968219289456,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}