{"id":"W2010335675","doi":"10.1023/a:1025438223608","title":"Eyewitness accuracy rates in police showup and lineup presentations: A meta-analytic comparison.","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Law and Human Behavior","topic":"Deception detection and forensic psychology","field":"Psychology","cited_by":170,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Eyewitness identification; Psychology; Suspect; Identification (biology); Social psychology; Legal psychology; Statistics; Criminology; Data mining; Mathematics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_broad"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0178242,0.001104308,0.005049981,0.00338893,0.0003210014,0.001609054,0.001594651,0.001569944,0.001749914],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05799322,0.0007294817,0.01070996,0.004523559,0.0005691159,0.001103909,0.0007462007,0.000981689,0.0002108617],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007460383,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007833642,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002638209,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003566955,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9858769,0.008554418,0.00259567,0.001417009,0.001413612,0.0001423453],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9401241,0.04863716,0.007780195,0.001365988,0.001784468,0.0003079642],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00773893,0.0001388038,0.08521581,0.1398591,0.6671003,0.0003963631,0.0004790644,0.0007148291,0.0004716945,0.000320765,0.001880842,0.09568366],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001802999,0.001320844,0.08111382,0.01377841,0.8948501,0.0005863347,0.0002831808,0.0003953681,0.0008296152,0.0007686447,0.004220293,0.00005040646],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.06070066,0.9341823,0.001988932,0.0005086072,0.0002217125,0.0002244775,0.001250684,0.0000425973,0.0008799274],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6523941,0.3420036,0.002324507,0.0006542603,0.0002138306,0.0006620666,0.001324668,0.00003039303,0.0003925594],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.99495,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09426451,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.301807120692852,"score_gpt":0.5210156555404128,"score_spread":0.2192085348475608,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}