{"id":"W2010490501","doi":"10.1375/anft.28.4.210","title":"The Discursive Performance of the Alliance in Family Therapy: A Conversation Analytic Perspective","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian and New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy","topic":"Counseling, Therapy, and Family Dynamics","field":"Psychology","cited_by":23,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Alliance; Conversation; Perspective (graphical); Family therapy; Strict constructionism; Conversation analysis; Meaning (existential); Psychotherapist; Psychology; Social constructionism; Sociology; Epistemology; Communication; Political science; Computer science; Social science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01764009,0.0006202147,0.0006022255,0.003332355,0.01172819,0.01144861,0.001895696,0.003114101,0.001503679],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01509294,0.0004559291,0.0004226172,0.002035658,0.04529062,0.0118154,0.006735639,0.00403432,0.0002132616],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007655503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005241089,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007690297,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005184947,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9745823,0.02288675,0.0002619784,0.0004589936,0.001082505,0.0007274519],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871579,0.01089293,0.0006577804,0.0004489541,0.0004405659,0.0004017749],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003004726,0.00002218817,0.0005683862,0.0001298533,0.00001048811,0.0004896334,0.8127841,0.0002690425,0.0004659933,0.1775722,0.0006480477,0.007010004],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002323028,0.00006320525,0.001394489,0.0005293026,0.00002390104,0.001220705,0.7873241,0.001861924,0.001426927,0.1470898,0.05898866,0.00005374237],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6280813,0.01550802,0.09412894,0.03877004,0.0004127934,0.0004043918,0.0001271344,0.0001742246,0.2223931],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9918444,0.001233416,0.004645573,0.0003549283,0.00003782743,0.0001204741,0.00001193832,0.00002606663,0.001725397],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01764009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09329087,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04467785220355155,"score_gpt":0.3246531691670569,"score_spread":0.2799753169635054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}