{"id":"W2010588406","doi":"10.1002/env.935","title":"Comparison of three expert elicitation methods for logistic regression on predicting the presence of the threatened brush‐tailed rock‐wallaby <i>Petrogale penicillata</i>","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmetrics","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":56,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Expert elicitation; Threatened species; Computer science; Logistic regression; Machine learning; Bayesian probability; Prior probability; Artificial intelligence; Data science; Data mining; Statistics; Ecology; Habitat; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005588182,0.0001746799,0.0002799928,0.00004930703,0.0004073993,0.000009130824,0.000550814,0.0001074872,0.001249632],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001446601,0.000101104,0.0001570312,0.0007157549,0.0003995361,0.00008504881,0.0002706623,0.0001582501,0.00003403279],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00026108,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000009618255,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001357918,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004026271,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982579,0.0001767484,0.0004369407,0.0003004395,0.0005696529,0.0002583345],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9975032,0.00137402,0.0004684119,0.0005809379,0.00001946214,0.00005403213],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002184403,0.0005493658,0.8992922,0.00003715491,0.00003565381,6.99993e-7,0.002799691,0.005568448,0.06307935,0.0003369381,0.008252093,0.01982991],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008881644,0.0004270799,0.8355431,0.00004591711,0.00005836257,0.000005373864,0.001768572,0.02483758,0.124,0.000202843,0.01197483,0.0002481643],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9659138,0.0009466548,0.02879173,0.000458309,0.0003161392,0.0008464149,0.00008989781,0.00002988883,0.002607175],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99708,0.000333109,0.002163689,0.00009773163,0.00002778345,0.00004749828,0.00002342383,0.00001643057,0.00021037],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06374918,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996634,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1478412605297001,"score_gpt":0.3759036128332387,"score_spread":0.2280623523035386,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}