{"id":"W2010630721","doi":"10.1016/j.compbiolchem.2004.11.003","title":"Assessment of chemical libraries for their druggability","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computational Biology and Chemistry","topic":"Computational Drug Discovery Methods","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; McGill University; Montreal General Hospital; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Druggability; Virtual screening; Metric (unit); Function (biology); Computer science; Chemical database; Rank (graph theory); Drug discovery; Data mining; Computational biology; Information retrieval; Chemistry; Bioinformatics; Mathematics; Biology; Biochemistry; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001845259,0.0007754734,0.000877533,0.004362825,0.0005982746,0.00156509,0.0005809715,0.000618068,0.005014494],"category_scores_gemma":[0.009013603,0.0002928176,0.0007990928,0.002471625,0.0003662472,0.001297985,0.0007652463,0.0004881353,0.001025871],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006331004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007637506,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007660993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001349747,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991,0.000281943,0.00007946503,0.000104281,0.000355194,0.00007927641],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952883,0.002694697,0.0004706327,0.0004475517,0.0008723295,0.0002265001],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01031116,0.002531212,0.02001632,0.001649025,0.00103693,0.000425164,0.0002498578,0.1399343,0.3659197,0.006463639,0.00414326,0.4473195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000828769,0.01503978,0.01630505,0.0001762918,0.001541014,0.0008912363,0.0003265024,0.2939604,0.6486478,0.008535954,0.01356345,0.00018385],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9525619,0.007205426,0.02174592,0.0005156817,0.00006236921,0.0004164594,0.00519763,0.00138771,0.01090686],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9611014,0.00297891,0.02710012,0.0001371879,0.00003557031,0.0002034826,0.005245036,0.00017323,0.003025109],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005014494,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01677513,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01758096119271337,"score_gpt":0.32629576203244,"score_spread":0.3087148008397267,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}