{"id":"W2010643622","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-5457.2012.00525.x","title":"CHEMOSTRATIGRAPHY OF CENOMANIAN–TURONIAN CARBONATES OF THE SARVAK FORMATION, SOUTHERN IRAN","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Petroleum Geology","topic":"Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Subaerial; Geology; Cenomanian; Diagenesis; Chemostratigraphy; Unconformity; Paleontology; Geochemistry; Carbonate; Cretaceous; Radiogenic nuclide; Paleosol; Isotopes of carbon; Sedimentary rock; Total organic carbon; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005072325,0.0001090137,0.0003182116,0.0001449834,0.00007547484,0.000004290479,0.0003533345,0.0001217975,0.000212808],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004651043,0.00006736316,0.0002356276,0.0001491207,0.0003669077,0.0002255048,0.000002588902,0.0002428346,0.000003045227],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000001724524,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005895189,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003193922,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002555822,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987336,0.000165141,0.0005663812,0.00005969817,0.0002078053,0.0002673501],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987167,0.0001256966,0.0008345125,0.0001457489,0.0000881537,0.00008921183],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006699302,0.00003126423,0.9926062,0.00001993533,0.00006785819,0.00000184292,0.001262201,0.00008202322,0.0007164701,0.0001558432,0.00006161301,0.004927722],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003539042,0.000242442,0.996053,0.00001429003,0.00004641243,0.0002110948,0.0006443422,0.00009842909,0.001149815,0.0007422641,0.0003806301,0.00006341048],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9768181,0.008479274,0.00003904672,0.0004995684,0.0004398528,0.00003695591,0.0000251608,0.000002839064,0.01365918],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994609,0.00005037398,0.0003167223,0.00004043234,0.0001134915,1.279752e-7,0.000001231001,8.124496e-7,0.00001595077],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02264274,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.274699,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01265015456986742,"score_gpt":0.2000642537921515,"score_spread":0.1874140992222841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}