{"id":"W2010643622","doi":"10.1111/j.1747-5457.2012.00525.x","title":"CHEMOSTRATIGRAPHY OF CENOMANIAN–TURONIAN CARBONATES OF THE SARVAK FORMATION, SOUTHERN IRAN","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Petroleum Geology","topic":"Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":60,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo; University of Windsor","funders":"","keywords":"Subaerial; Geology; Cenomanian; Diagenesis; Chemostratigraphy; Unconformity; Paleontology; Geochemistry; Carbonate; Cretaceous; Radiogenic nuclide; Paleosol; Isotopes of carbon; Sedimentary rock; Total organic carbon; Chemistry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001120996,0.0003702682,0.0002412482,0.001236597,0.0003952836,0.0004129774,0.0002324283,0.0001839548,0.0004657497],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001693633,0.0002964539,0.0002387661,0.000806827,0.0004331851,0.0002096665,0.0003280503,0.0001246341,0.0001440251],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005087277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005942825,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03035241,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.04992448,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999131,0.000004274466,0.000008093106,0.00002901923,0.00002626742,0.00001929822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9999301,0.000004837852,0.00002364422,0.000004276928,0.00002590189,0.00001122667],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000281542,0.00004139285,0.8400896,0.0001459945,0.0001190862,0.0005426853,0.001487088,0.0008137656,0.1307684,0.0001259114,0.000188248,0.02539623],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006965862,0.00002956839,0.9979448,0.000003631108,0.00001179974,0.0001862012,0.0002208404,0.0002261815,0.0009919775,0.000006763009,0.0003686043,0.000002810142],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992912,0.00007639634,0.00003780891,0.000005898643,0.000001959383,0.000003727902,0.00006561096,0.000004865492,0.0005125619],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9994617,0.00007375459,0.0001301895,0.000004932351,0.000001643362,0.000002473684,0.0001445137,0.00000256377,0.0001781201],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03035241,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06035149,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01265015456986742,"score_gpt":0.2000642537921515,"score_spread":0.1874140992222841,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}