{"id":"W2010700167","doi":"10.1007/s00799-006-0003-4","title":"Generating customized yet factually consistent information: a constraint satisfaction approach","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal on Digital Libraries","topic":"Data Visualization and Analytics","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Constraint satisfaction problem; Personalization; Consistency (knowledge bases); Set (abstract data type); Constraint (computer-aided design); Constraint satisfaction; Snippet; Information retrieval; World Wide Web; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001190189,0.0001467166,0.000140239,0.000258361,0.0001541734,0.007524288,0.0005753325,0.00004755145,0.00005597011],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001562855,0.0001242291,0.00010421,0.0001431234,0.00008193222,0.008426933,0.0001501519,0.0001699277,0.0000945981],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007495075,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001934308,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005548641,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.365114e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984273,0.00003107435,0.0005445656,0.0001429922,0.0006973445,0.0001566705],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990579,0.0001008603,0.0003270335,0.0001424147,0.0002815942,0.00009020318],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003539392,0.00009930292,0.001374614,0.000003961214,0.00009216651,0.00002645066,0.000243502,0.006657616,0.0000231849,0.9247591,0.01587608,0.05080866],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005564094,0.0002812751,0.006179216,0.0001735228,0.00002472049,0.002238054,0.0008013629,0.5062244,0.0009791225,0.04964786,0.4267364,0.001149988],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007905493,0.00002416143,0.9268884,0.001766451,0.001153416,0.00009148949,0.0001466945,0.0001720463,0.06185183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.971347,0.000009714867,0.02531234,0.002206109,0.0003105993,0.000003763052,0.0003229131,0.000007895515,0.0004796901],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9634415,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.993506,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01486148997786254,"score_gpt":0.2381679105484165,"score_spread":0.2233064205705539,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}