{"id":"W2010769377","doi":"10.2316/journal.206.2008.1.206-3083","title":"TARGET TRACKING ROBOTIC MANIPULATION THEORIES APPLIED TO FORCE/POSITION CONTROL IN PEG-IN-HOLE ASSEMBLY TASKS","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Robotics and Automation","topic":"Robot Manipulation and Learning","field":"Engineering","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Tracking (education); Position (finance); Position tracking; Computer science; Control (management); PEG ratio; Computer vision; Artificial intelligence; Control theory (sociology); Control engineering; Engineering; Actuator; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007864775,0.0006149239,0.0005977722,0.0006066479,0.0004708749,0.0006883676,0.0006708033,0.0008736445,0.00168195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001670232,0.0002688891,0.0004772746,0.0004672419,0.001078926,0.0007550037,0.0006061242,0.000463719,0.0002423042],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004621031,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003681049,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002637781,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001268653,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995403,0.00009880365,0.00002256371,0.00006579972,0.0002450933,0.00002745416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992223,0.0004264207,0.000135227,0.00004025297,0.0001611729,0.00001469555],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002104966,0.0001264815,0.001558334,0.0006418121,0.0001041015,0.0003768142,0.0004833995,0.6942475,0.04344387,0.05860311,0.0007083375,0.1994957],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002039744,0.0003677032,0.001251277,0.00003708924,0.00003480081,0.0002039981,0.00005684195,0.9755627,0.009593403,0.01047564,0.002370843,0.00002536523],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02915954,0.0009411323,0.9637609,0.00009153001,0.00003584702,0.00006987536,0.000009556675,0.000183002,0.005748732],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8735554,0.001651573,0.11919,0.00008190201,0.00004507737,0.000221159,0.00003167844,0.00003570589,0.005187518],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002637781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005626678,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01246904669225341,"score_gpt":0.2415296420481096,"score_spread":0.2290605953558562,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}