{"id":"W2010820140","doi":"10.1016/j.mcm.2010.07.026","title":"Dynamically-consistent non-standard finite difference method for an epidemic model","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical and Computer Modelling","topic":"Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models","field":"Medicine","cited_by":45,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Applied mathematics; Convergence (economics); Spurious relationship; Basic reproduction number; Steady state (chemistry); Epidemic model; Finite difference; Numerical analysis; Mathematical analysis; Population","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001251471,0.0002769925,0.0009354773,0.00005775904,0.000178635,0.00002751468,0.0001449751,0.0003559656,0.0000636478],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002061619,0.0001882292,0.0002012804,0.00004720446,0.0002922135,0.00005951085,0.000100434,0.0005565305,0.00001430538],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009813489,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00003745201,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001870429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001490625,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981508,0.00006245637,0.0006400115,0.0005327166,0.0001361193,0.000477915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.996841,0.002130358,0.00008264458,0.0003677844,0.0001115384,0.000466744],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002297287,0.0002786165,0.00002377718,0.0005804743,0.00005817062,0.00000334741,0.0002060909,0.02077071,0.000353544,0.9709052,0.00002123154,0.006569131],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003365033,0.0002324447,0.000005417846,0.00007211444,0.0000851175,0.00004226301,0.000003975673,0.5244619,0.00004118372,0.4745907,0.000009109799,0.0001193052],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.1220645,0.00001191822,0.8753707,0.001009729,0.00006900543,0.0004738383,0.00001124747,0.00007883766,0.0009101662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.398311,0.000008411154,0.6000315,0.001296118,0.00009603867,0.00006505967,0.0000100849,0.00001840452,0.0001633965],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5036912,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7675764,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05020703010649093,"score_gpt":0.3220948361358963,"score_spread":0.2718878060294054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}