{"id":"W2010898123","doi":"10.1007/s10951-006-8596-4","title":"A case study of mutual routing-scheduling reformulation","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scheduling","topic":"Vehicle Routing Optimization Methods","field":"Engineering","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Japan Society for the Promotion of Science; University College Cork; University of Glasgow","keywords":"Computer science; Vehicle routing problem; Scheduling (production processes); Mathematical optimization; Software; Job shop scheduling; Key (lock); Combinatorial optimization; Operations research; Constraint programming; Industrial engineering; Routing (electronic design automation); Mathematics; Algorithm; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001659697,0.0003396613,0.0004561613,0.0003202237,0.001134668,0.001153753,0.001011551,0.001876661,0.006962367],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004155788,0.0001999292,0.0006856361,0.0006566147,0.0007173824,0.001109644,0.001001213,0.001023863,0.0003908532],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001103136,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001126118,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006423889,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006057002,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999008,0.0005351701,0.00002083441,0.00008832337,0.0001836223,0.0001641072],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985889,0.0009278765,0.00009885118,0.0001949069,0.0001235831,0.0000659116],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"case_report","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002648304,0.0003973001,0.001392546,0.0001323254,0.00004266477,0.002186247,0.0004642921,0.6241788,0.002231471,0.3223432,0.006258501,0.04010781],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001005018,0.0002160511,0.0005434607,0.0000152995,0.0000332731,0.0004978474,0.0004448484,0.9378781,0.003108832,0.04332945,0.01380961,0.00002276033],"study_design_candidate":"case_report","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.490271,0.0004433943,0.4057725,0.002893746,0.000146208,0.000341257,0.0003861589,0.0005400615,0.09920571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9167921,0.0001104488,0.07083666,0.00008651434,0.00003450036,0.00008259689,0.0001286761,0.00006237155,0.01186612],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006962367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02329141,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0248211093843664,"score_gpt":0.2835155563058206,"score_spread":0.2586944469214543,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}