{"id":"W2010909440","doi":"10.1016/j.emj.2015.03.007","title":"The future of strategic management research: Assessing the quality of theory borrowing","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"European Management Journal","topic":"Management and Organizational Studies","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":61,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Strategic management; Quality (philosophy); Subject (documents); Empirical research; Work (physics); Field (mathematics); Foundation (evidence); Perspective (graphical); Management theory; Business; Marketing; Management science; Economics; Political science; Computer science; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1906194,0.0009354405,0.002614718,0.01772444,0.003388392,0.0215471,0.003980336,0.004969311,0.004635206],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3637433,0.0007446287,0.001066269,0.009182386,0.03657762,0.03381794,0.007344453,0.00640763,0.0006275977],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008929405,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01786551,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002080102,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002443941,"domain_scores_codex":[0.889931,0.08234678,0.003870987,0.004235767,0.01809282,0.001522683],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3179756,0.6028181,0.01859522,0.02652857,0.02891118,0.005171358],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007314822,0.0006873338,0.06640246,0.004395637,0.001121364,0.0002154082,0.009005755,0.003555672,0.0006718706,0.6730398,0.0065327,0.2336404],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009506014,0.0002381923,0.01130009,0.002939929,0.0001632015,0.0001237222,0.008111284,0.008706454,0.0004452536,0.9555279,0.01229282,0.00005617027],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2728964,0.2093425,0.08906819,0.324425,0.003600411,0.0005283882,0.0005788128,0.0002341369,0.09932612],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9498959,0.02263478,0.01999378,0.005509468,0.0009270454,0.0002092041,0.0001775069,0.00004440809,0.0006078762],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8093806,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981104,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1791972267597379,"score_gpt":0.3565265913022257,"score_spread":0.1773293645424878,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}