{"id":"W2010935164","doi":"10.1016/j.physd.2009.10.015","title":"On continuation of inviscid vortex patches","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physica D Nonlinear Phenomena","topic":"Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows","field":"Engineering","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Inviscid flow; Mathematics; Vortex; Vorticity; Euler equations; Prandtl number; Continuation; Mathematical analysis; Perturbation (astronomy); Euler's formula; Manifold (fluid mechanics); Applied mathematics; Classical mechanics; Physics; Mechanics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00004961304,0.0001278403,0.000180472,0.00005346095,0.00002031777,0.00001176406,0.000103087,0.00002765975,0.00002560566],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008360937,0.0001217786,0.00006297338,0.0001311254,0.0000170551,0.00006579975,0.000008327715,0.00009018173,0.00005359874],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002016401,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000006521941,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003013549,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000001168845,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993927,0.000008209065,0.0001791183,0.000123624,0.0001408689,0.0001554692],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996523,0.00003123047,0.00003359856,0.0002104032,0.00002964034,0.0000427725],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001154528,0.001501429,0.0002221819,0.0001690314,0.0002399878,0.000006486864,0.002263992,0.4344066,0.1916629,0.05843813,0.003963403,0.3070104],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004428906,0.0002021695,0.002748194,0.00003174657,0.00001555181,2.016594e-7,0.00001212745,0.9824141,0.005229405,0.006862509,0.001827297,0.0002137591],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9762401,0.00009118512,0.000706099,0.0001457375,0.0001517132,0.0001602651,0.00003713153,0.000157468,0.02231028],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9986128,0.00002422992,0.0008382641,0.00008150411,0.0003069511,0.000003747218,0.00004132961,0.00001936794,0.00007185511],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5480075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4965988,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.006376872935426938,"score_gpt":0.2012756351804364,"score_spread":0.1948987622450095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}