{"id":"W2011016059","doi":"10.1353/jcs.2006.0020","title":"Contexts in Conflict: Public and Private Components of Assessment in Ethical Judgements","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Social Science and Policy Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Politics; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Public opinion; Observer (physics); Boundary (topology); Epistemology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Public relations; Positive economics; Law; Economics; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002603259,0.00005203193,0.0002485022,0.0007390738,0.0001584999,0.00003758407,0.0001958226,0.00007994906,0.00002620813],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007561699,0.00004552743,0.00002887095,0.0006863523,0.0004946322,0.0002017848,0.00003358634,0.0003791528,0.000001375663],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000476843,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008361739,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1626041,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8873035,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984383,0.0002703239,0.0003476069,0.00006842492,0.0005199902,0.0003553634],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990977,0.0002251384,0.000133371,0.00003816502,0.000216428,0.0002891812],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000147761,0.0000647407,0.8663522,0.00001593873,0.00007621833,0.00004269827,0.06131211,0.000004726761,0.0001743395,0.04695618,0.005008138,0.01997793],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006235833,0.00005657614,0.732262,0.00007190988,0.000003810951,0.000001160697,0.01437915,0.000005288056,0.000009782926,0.001062104,0.2514606,0.00006409685],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9256968,0.0009047285,2.842366e-7,0.06486811,0.00008830919,0.0001036463,0.000002688618,9.01078e-7,0.008334462],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959114,0.002951526,0.00007006575,0.0008490997,0.000112822,0.00000204241,1.177528e-7,0.000002094029,0.00010079],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7246994,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8429722,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2382155639359479,"score_gpt":0.4974116575194326,"score_spread":0.2591960935834847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}