{"id":"W2011016059","doi":"10.1353/jcs.2006.0020","title":"Contexts in Conflict: Public and Private Components of Assessment in Ethical Judgements","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Canadian Studies","topic":"Social Science and Policy Research","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Scrutiny; Politics; Context (archaeology); Sociology; Public opinion; Observer (physics); Boundary (topology); Epistemology; Political science; Environmental ethics; Public relations; Positive economics; Law; Economics; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03269502,0.000525412,0.0008411037,0.003684676,0.01473772,0.01724187,0.001580347,0.002137614,0.002330102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1315797,0.001163336,0.0004976061,0.003303827,0.0382097,0.009814015,0.01765643,0.004835941,0.0001337242],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02099353,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01535222,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1136053,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1721785,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9000086,0.07719778,0.002277356,0.002936987,0.01272312,0.004856084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8466519,0.1144693,0.01594782,0.006706684,0.01069528,0.00552908],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004380038,0.0002007681,0.1367,0.0003024713,0.00008825768,0.0005318453,0.7144723,0.0009011706,0.001093001,0.09989068,0.001174136,0.04420738],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006328945,0.0001410691,0.2401405,0.0006646603,0.0001107931,0.0004551021,0.6480504,0.001868313,0.0009206283,0.0929241,0.0144688,0.0001923627],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9176,0.001725651,0.006750727,0.006998443,0.00007962437,0.0001128045,0.00006717524,0.00001797895,0.06664749],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999196,0.0000950874,0.0004493948,0.00009300446,0.000008905471,0.00002420675,0.000005811349,0.000004797859,0.0001226643],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1136053,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.225888,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2382155639359479,"score_gpt":0.4974116575194326,"score_spread":0.2591960935834847,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}