{"id":"W2011056924","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2014-0125","title":"Strategic analysis of forest vulnerability to risk related to fire: an example from the coniferous boreal forest of Quebec","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":55,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Ministère des Ressources naturelles et des Forêts; Centre de Géomatique du Québec; Natural Resources Canada; Canadian Forest Service","funders":"","keywords":"Taiga; Boreal; Productivity; Context (archaeology); Vulnerability (computing); Fire regime; Disturbance (geology); Forest management; Geography; Climate change; Environmental science; Forestry; Sustainability; Physical geography; Environmental resource management; Agroforestry; Ecology; Ecosystem","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003597366,0.000312331,0.0002094271,0.001305271,0.001547972,0.0009279891,0.0004741127,0.0002947022,0.001909588],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008300819,0.00007273057,0.0003094778,0.002570059,0.0004366839,0.0002297675,0.0003621734,0.0002915493,0.00007994151],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01602023,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005514073,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9817742,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9924728,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998265,0.00004172768,0.000004754323,0.0000214172,0.00003336006,0.00007228003],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993748,0.0001602768,0.00004773206,0.000024172,0.0002871182,0.0001059033],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003952728,0.0002452536,0.8643599,0.000135191,0.0002360741,0.002030086,0.001847866,0.06977527,0.003249574,0.005315997,0.00453529,0.04787417],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002266964,0.00005786621,0.911034,0.00003199994,0.0000707306,0.0002218268,0.005273751,0.07780214,0.0003460826,0.0008427923,0.004259952,0.00003604306],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9913198,0.0002763294,0.0009017864,0.0002513094,0.000003348589,0.00004577034,0.001151101,0.00002378854,0.006026645],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9974716,0.0001193905,0.0008258866,0.00002021596,0.000001539406,0.000007496848,0.0003928446,0.000003879574,0.001157225],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01822579,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1162354,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06852459248373684,"score_gpt":0.3117791916825476,"score_spread":0.2432545991988108,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}