{"id":"W2011098670","doi":"10.1103/physreve.70.056701","title":"Apparent slip over a solid-liquid interface with a no-slip boundary condition","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physical Review E","topic":"Lattice Boltzmann Simulation Studies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":65,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Slip (aerodynamics); Lattice Boltzmann methods; Boundary value problem; Mechanics; No-slip condition; Materials science; Slip line field; Slip ratio; Kinetic energy; Contact angle; Physics; Thermodynamics; Classical mechanics; Composite material; Boundary layer; Boundary layer thickness; Shear stress","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004373571,0.000478145,0.0008707618,0.0005398333,0.0006486134,0.001177285,0.0008149353,0.001271236,0.001535648],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002133177,0.0003493472,0.0003285789,0.0003615471,0.001755386,0.001385554,0.00105381,0.0009923573,0.0001534336],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007306291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006840664,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001963276,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001523156,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998098,0.00003599805,0.00001137763,0.00003550809,0.00006097618,0.00004631994],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999348,0.00031915,0.0001156938,0.00006796747,0.0000597191,0.00008957327],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0007736523,0.0003986545,0.00539738,0.0005351678,0.00008261925,0.002708264,0.0005429504,0.4874541,0.1953215,0.2903283,0.0008715798,0.01558572],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001056989,0.0001337282,0.0008170349,0.00001521299,0.00002061349,0.0001674541,0.00006120717,0.9529665,0.02218258,0.02267203,0.0008303577,0.00002755745],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9504266,0.0006657379,0.04049793,0.0004144879,0.00008701639,0.00003828814,0.00006840274,0.00005992538,0.007741531],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933201,0.000208301,0.005059824,0.0000323959,0.00002597871,0.00001672942,0.00003561501,0.00001330441,0.001287887],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001963276,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.005301118,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01552549054851234,"score_gpt":0.3181432501725533,"score_spread":0.302617759624041,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}