{"id":"W2011139860","doi":"10.1016/j.asw.2013.05.001","title":"Assessing cohesion in children’s writing: Development of a checklist","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Assessing Writing","topic":"Writing and Handwriting Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Cohesion (chemistry); Checklist; Inter-rater reliability; Writing assessment; Psychology; Internal consistency; Consistency (knowledge bases); Discriminative model; Mathematics education; Computer science; Applied psychology; Psychometrics; Rating scale; Cognitive psychology; Clinical psychology; Developmental psychology; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002597624,0.0001789626,0.000303714,0.0002727582,0.001132049,0.001119864,0.0002698178,0.0001642407,0.0000986102],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009566505,0.000207195,0.0000634418,0.0005840379,0.0001952958,0.001573543,0.00006810775,0.0003191697,0.00002551311],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000290473,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007793403,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002683338,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002284255,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997239,0.0003279394,0.000873515,0.0003788767,0.00054733,0.0006333268],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985252,0.0004557157,0.0004211847,0.0001752829,0.0002919963,0.0001305886],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000001007467,0.0002077468,0.7682241,0.00008045324,0.00001296379,0.000001546662,0.0120511,0.000007733297,0.01030444,0.001757728,0.0001418444,0.2072094],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003968043,0.000008090785,0.9045373,0.001733585,0.00001192628,0.000005814661,0.08806507,0.0001913806,0.003928673,0.000458744,0.0002885085,0.0003741069],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9623764,0.0001270845,0.0003902602,0.0005808807,0.0001200207,0.0002784877,4.939319e-7,0.0001442903,0.0359821],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9682068,0.000008366118,0.03107151,0.00007822562,0.0004002069,0.00005018333,0.0000172358,0.0000293864,0.0001380812],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2068353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999171,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03760340143721072,"score_gpt":0.3669574726933187,"score_spread":0.3293540712561079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}