{"id":"W2011139860","doi":"10.1016/j.asw.2013.05.001","title":"Assessing cohesion in children’s writing: Development of a checklist","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Assessing Writing","topic":"Writing and Handwriting Education","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":50,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Cohesion (chemistry); Checklist; Inter-rater reliability; Writing assessment; Psychology; Internal consistency; Consistency (knowledge bases); Discriminative model; Mathematics education; Computer science; Applied psychology; Psychometrics; Rating scale; Cognitive psychology; Clinical psychology; Developmental psychology; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0151284,0.001283045,0.001685036,0.005333402,0.001590673,0.001978777,0.002491752,0.0009923067,0.001235396],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04194091,0.0009553426,0.002633334,0.002149128,0.0008790696,0.002356042,0.003517891,0.002484421,0.0005479092],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002971188,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009444455,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009898545,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0191316,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9849027,0.00363849,0.005016186,0.0008117337,0.004946515,0.0006844129],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9479743,0.01363807,0.01038932,0.002096033,0.02367276,0.002229518],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003282313,0.001987179,0.4849405,0.002179171,0.000532302,0.0009243078,0.01849814,0.003514795,0.01336766,0.001875219,0.02131816,0.4505343],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001802403,0.001706388,0.9270679,0.001461985,0.0003799752,0.001869407,0.009419229,0.005947642,0.01542436,0.001662483,0.03453365,0.0003467896],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.8507724,0.002081043,0.08861715,0.002549507,0.0007895763,0.02271008,0.00476317,0.001497699,0.02621936],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4885105,0.002795662,0.4627481,0.0005448026,0.0001438184,0.02964554,0.006283848,0.0002871384,0.009040654],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0151284,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08000761,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03760340143721072,"score_gpt":0.3669574726933187,"score_spread":0.3293540712561079,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}