{"id":"W2011172953","doi":"10.1353/cjl.2007.0009","title":"Everything is Psycholinguistics: Material and Methodological Considerations in the Study of Compound Processing","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La revue canadienne de linguistique","topic":"Reading and Literacy Development","field":"Psychology","cited_by":28,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"","keywords":"Morpheme; Psycholinguistics; Computer science; Natural language processing; Transparency (behavior); Semantic interpretation; Interpretation (philosophy); Information processing; Artificial intelligence; Linguistics; Psychology; Cognitive psychology; Cognition","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006071412,0.0002211128,0.0004703047,0.0003515832,0.0004108105,0.0002341868,0.0004644818,0.0001665176,0.00007959611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01670789,0.0001597096,0.00006235261,0.0002302112,0.0002692594,0.00001744478,0.0000193689,0.0008507459,0.000001290861],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003017907,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001026436,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04983011,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3887706,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968711,0.001122885,0.001070342,0.0002386689,0.0001285182,0.0005685329],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958413,0.001842628,0.0006070704,0.0003523191,0.0009503828,0.0004063606],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001556468,0.0003105817,0.03948445,0.0001329368,0.0002479571,0.005063967,0.8401397,0.000854415,0.0000340094,0.1074629,0.003061412,0.00305207],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00540845,0.001830638,0.2444034,0.001919273,0.0009183246,0.01673703,0.07387805,0.001511652,0.0001064896,0.09064203,0.5610161,0.001628572],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9877055,0.0007216422,0.0001379038,0.001675826,0.00169729,0.0003466426,0.00004223182,0.000007040791,0.007665974],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9889027,0.000008012944,0.007683418,0.0009310938,0.002320028,0.000011809,0.000002571287,0.00002627371,0.0001141031],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7662616,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9915748,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06706145224170935,"score_gpt":0.3623383343087613,"score_spread":0.295276882067052,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}