{"id":"W2011236497","doi":"10.1016/j.amc.2009.08.028","title":"First-order accurate finite difference schemes for boundary vorticity approximations in curvilinear geometries","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Mathematics and Computation","topic":"Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Curvilinear coordinates; Mathematics; Finite difference; Grid; Vorticity; Finite difference method; Boundary (topology); Domain (mathematical analysis); Mathematical analysis; Boundary value problem; Geometry; Vortex; Mechanics; Physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001111846,0.000141783,0.0001858792,0.0001308366,0.0001046045,0.0001075969,0.0000638034,0.00005145567,0.000001598],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004409306,0.0001462648,0.00002494551,0.0003020476,0.00002414752,0.00006490884,0.00001691554,0.00008060846,0.000002218745],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002940672,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001532316,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001303394,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001583944,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992719,0.000001837589,0.0003136497,0.0001447145,0.0001103647,0.0001575828],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994396,0.0003319205,0.00004922858,0.00007669544,0.0000662325,0.00003631919],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006850628,0.0001078861,0.00003030979,0.0002903872,0.00001641486,3.824248e-7,0.0005832217,0.7992014,0.0003995903,0.1694678,0.00001713268,0.02987859],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002935883,0.00001946303,0.001938672,0.00002541143,0.000008726545,8.272747e-7,0.00004633838,0.8330358,0.00002097455,0.1644029,0.00007139994,0.0001358436],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.301271,0.00006498225,0.6980205,0.00007473672,0.00003145788,0.0002701715,0.00001421699,0.00007131488,0.0001816484],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8196846,0.00004712555,0.180061,0.0000359623,0.00001925832,0.00004124212,0.00009072243,0.00001352911,0.000006577116],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5184136,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5964506,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01359726123501442,"score_gpt":0.2401805536824712,"score_spread":0.2265832924474568,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}