{"id":"W2011241450","doi":"10.4279/pip.040004","title":"Invited review: The new spin foam models and quantum gravity","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Papers in Physics","topic":"Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Spin foam; Semiclassical physics; Quantum gravity; Loop quantum gravity; Group field theory; Physics; Limit (mathematics); Quantum; Theoretical physics; Spin (aerodynamics); Semiclassical gravity; Mathematical physics; Quantum mechanics; Mathematics; Quantum dynamics; Quantum process; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002861275,0.0001680813,0.0002408935,0.00001358989,0.0001216888,0.00002328017,0.0001484192,0.00002119136,0.00001948108],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000008336783,0.0001184246,0.00007737623,0.0002123299,0.0001279767,0.0002414616,0.00008962677,0.0002353346,0.00001048272],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001282391,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001503283,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002794882,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005557091,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991429,0.0001273575,0.0001735471,0.0001395361,0.0001220593,0.0002945859],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994017,0.0001380042,0.00008249342,0.0002673198,0.00001796313,0.00009251132],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001544123,0.0001938987,0.03202014,0.00009521061,0.0000621662,3.47844e-7,0.003199611,0.0000317321,0.0004889551,0.858822,0.009814925,0.0952556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000458224,0.00003341711,0.003669604,0.0002989525,0.00007292519,7.126145e-7,0.0008774143,0.0008123311,0.0006763252,0.9531908,0.03956791,0.0003414076],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7452388,0.0777273,0.031774,0.03328176,0.001800219,0.003742008,0.0002660689,0.0002407705,0.1059291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966168,0.000500329,0.0001668213,0.00213762,0.0004477032,0.00002322711,0.00002781792,0.00001656883,0.00006309588],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2513781,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4829214,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02259702253779696,"score_gpt":0.2932837244028691,"score_spread":0.2706867018650722,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}