{"id":"W2011255472","doi":"10.1002/cjs.10018","title":"A practical method for analysing heavy tailed data","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Statistics","topic":"Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Estimator; Quantile; Statistics; Interval estimation; Point estimation; Index (typography); Estimation; Heavy-tailed distribution; Statistical inference; Fraction (chemistry); Mathematics; Inference; Sample size determination; Econometrics; Confidence interval; Computer science; Probability distribution; Artificial intelligence; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00140009,0.00008976554,0.0003766262,0.0002772645,0.000143448,0.0001062436,0.0002650546,0.00006744048,0.00007144663],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002769348,0.0001034062,0.00006093676,0.0001541419,0.00002639652,0.0002786138,0.000008265072,0.0002003112,0.00001001518],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001280663,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006697507,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001935892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006683328,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987479,0.00001718275,0.0007423197,0.0001804801,0.00003468149,0.0002774293],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998516,0.0002080206,0.0004701167,0.0002823552,0.0001747195,0.0003487538],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009129343,0.00005555539,0.008702829,0.00003288404,0.0001187817,0.0001374055,0.0005615788,0.001058212,0.000007206636,0.8588006,0.08117307,0.04926059],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006273003,0.0002878951,0.005307551,0.00003135074,0.00007091915,0.00005935179,0.00008463514,0.530632,0.000006926921,0.3344742,0.1281756,0.0002421869],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.001033443,0.0006407756,0.9931165,0.002007516,0.0002756878,0.00007769936,0.002462291,0.000002228409,0.0003838311],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2866828,0.00004162979,0.7125893,0.0003685303,0.0002042484,3.578385e-7,0.00005010121,0.000009733212,0.00005332707],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5295738,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4216783,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2148934774820753,"score_gpt":0.3449894464346424,"score_spread":0.1300959689525671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}