{"id":"W2011268162","doi":"10.1118/1.4799841","title":"Evaluating noise reduction techniques while considering anatomical noise in dual‐energy contrast‐enhanced mammography","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Physics","topic":"Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging","field":"Medicine","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Office of Science; University of Waterloo","keywords":"Mammography; Noise reduction; Noise (video); Digital mammography; Reduction (mathematics); Dual energy; Contrast-to-noise ratio; Medical imaging; Medical physics; Signal-to-noise ratio (imaging); Digital Enhanced Cordless Telecommunications; Contrast (vision); Computer science; Acoustics; Medicine; Radiology; Physics; Optics; Image quality; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Telecommunications; Breast cancer; Wireless","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003317065,0.000241076,0.0004609831,0.0002225896,0.00006233812,0.00005730734,0.00008846418,0.0001500518,0.0001854671],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002157938,0.0002159476,0.0002041587,0.0007831405,0.0003596969,0.0004089061,0.00006245032,0.0004433755,0.00001982273],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006227518,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001491576,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001951671,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005824342,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977581,0.00006399702,0.0004824671,0.0004172568,0.000803888,0.0004743201],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998938,0.000116928,0.0001046112,0.0002784148,0.0001626031,0.0003994125],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001001038,0.0007257279,0.003661536,0.00009557998,0.00008272853,0.00007726818,0.0001935661,0.000005341092,0.09175576,0.0005978548,0.00134686,0.9013577],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008391872,0.001304923,0.03068293,0.003867088,0.0003032979,0.001178987,0.000751117,0.01027923,0.8880467,0.05199866,0.001622598,0.0015726],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9796722,0.0002476483,0.008585021,0.001800398,0.0002248671,0.000473008,0.00000443362,0.0003079925,0.008684448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968882,0.00005906567,0.001471666,0.0007771909,0.0005473651,0.0001465789,0.00003555979,0.00003593299,0.00003844321],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.899785,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8806089,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01917299299773283,"score_gpt":0.2915406121738184,"score_spread":0.2723676191760856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}