{"id":"W2011268162","doi":"10.1118/1.4799841","title":"Evaluating noise reduction techniques while considering anatomical noise in dual‐energy contrast‐enhanced mammography","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Medical Physics","topic":"Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging","field":"Medicine","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Office of Science; University of Waterloo","keywords":"Mammography; Noise reduction; Noise (video); Digital mammography; Reduction (mathematics); Dual energy; Contrast-to-noise ratio; Medical imaging; Medical physics; Signal-to-noise ratio (imaging); Digital Enhanced Cordless Telecommunications; Contrast (vision); Computer science; Acoustics; Medicine; Radiology; Physics; Optics; Image quality; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Telecommunications; Breast cancer; Wireless","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002357881,0.001106865,0.0007767151,0.001262993,0.000400792,0.001073302,0.001047991,0.00100802,0.0009353841],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007325288,0.0005368794,0.001025645,0.0005794084,0.0004899118,0.000869039,0.0008526341,0.0004300435,0.0002930578],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001029767,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007840168,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00206025,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003269146,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998008,0.000553686,0.00009432193,0.000218091,0.001058893,0.00006707122],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974873,0.001389528,0.0002931789,0.0002165604,0.0005688548,0.00004444575],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001506168,0.0004190104,0.01355933,0.0007908148,0.0002504755,0.0004225699,0.0004258578,0.3396818,0.2655135,0.004168122,0.0006257388,0.3726367],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002953049,0.000567999,0.00588542,0.00003761909,0.0001401427,0.0003942678,0.00004727914,0.8828461,0.1072314,0.001697528,0.001061174,0.00006149882],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1449753,0.0007213371,0.8528933,0.00009984186,0.00004502694,0.0001317864,0.00002659248,0.0003059356,0.0008007709],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6569072,0.0006573373,0.3404632,0.00007013704,0.0000367561,0.0001111224,0.00008266031,0.0001001734,0.001571361],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002357881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01246983,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01917299299773283,"score_gpt":0.2915406121738184,"score_spread":0.2723676191760856,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}