{"id":"W2011285045","doi":"10.3138/jsp.32.4.195","title":"Two-Faced at the Interface: Meditations on the Manuscript Review Committee","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Scholarly Publishing","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Publishing; Interface (matter); Process (computing); Research integrity; Editorial board; Academic integrity; Library science; Business; Political science; Management; Media studies; Computer science; Sociology; Public relations; Law; Economics; Operating system","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","scholarly_communication"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1186476,0.0008758961,0.0009460868,0.00284049,0.02590702,0.02027433,0.003364289,0.01283632,0.007085491],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3149063,0.001425035,0.001433195,0.001790758,0.03987914,0.02152103,0.01492472,0.04876115,0.004283806],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008465203,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01444072,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002951653,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005594261,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8867627,0.08493362,0.003067669,0.006948322,0.01411721,0.004170545],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7433991,0.1534383,0.0162874,0.02198756,0.03763655,0.02725101],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003117516,0.0001782906,0.001750479,0.0002906479,0.000162282,0.0005772253,0.1143351,0.0003854052,0.001623703,0.1402594,0.6601977,0.07992798],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001129513,0.0001087904,0.001155876,0.0005893738,0.00004754497,0.0005027992,0.03222595,0.0006956119,0.001148708,0.1014344,0.8617958,0.0001820808],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.006594484,0.005363978,0.02665537,0.9028493,0.03932832,0.00009569823,0.00002963383,0.0002918705,0.0187914],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3098515,0.006418374,0.04394232,0.5070105,0.06996009,0.0007404315,0.00007090508,0.001702891,0.06030303],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9797257,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6274757,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5769549932795691,"score_gpt":0.5507350731102838,"score_spread":0.02621992016928532,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}