{"id":"W2011352468","doi":"10.1139/x04-071","title":"Charcoal production, dispersal, and deposition from the Fort Providence experimental fire: interpreting fire regimes from charcoal records in boreal forests","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Fire effects on ecosystems","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":280,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"National Science Foundation","keywords":"Charcoal; Deposition (geology); Fire regime; Environmental science; Taiga; Boreal; Carbon fibers; Prescribed burn; Sediment; Geology; Hydrology (agriculture); Ecology; Forestry; Chemistry; Geography; Ecosystem; Paleontology; Biology; Materials science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007223861,0.000321626,0.0002176208,0.000703794,0.0006605727,0.0004698,0.0003688917,0.0001878832,0.0002413177],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001232224,0.0002045629,0.0001744034,0.0005003769,0.0004432493,0.0003235555,0.0003049594,0.0001915199,0.00004332263],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001167086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004275112,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1340098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.376641,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998337,0.00003988685,0.00001141954,0.00004885982,0.00003371879,0.00003236695],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994063,0.0001181664,0.0002520602,0.00006096989,0.00008985236,0.00007255201],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000295328,0.00004648482,0.978092,0.00002339531,0.00006743406,0.00007261535,0.0006201857,0.0004594073,0.0150037,0.00003337108,0.00008280487,0.005203328],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000001760476,0.00001512475,0.9989242,0.000002190933,0.00001050818,0.00002127511,0.0000872843,0.0002471217,0.000604148,0.000006164116,0.00007741483,0.000002805011],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.999693,0.00005739494,0.00008174778,0.000005007954,6.452981e-7,0.000001976992,0.00007843192,0.00000282235,0.0000790179],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999072,0.00006873248,0.0004272598,0.000006803094,0.000002639621,0.000006555582,0.0003420023,0.00000371839,0.0000704074],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8659902,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2664595,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01708876428659222,"score_gpt":0.2738277796216891,"score_spread":0.2567390153350969,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}