{"id":"W2011413825","doi":"10.1121/1.1288414","title":"Perceptual calibration of <i>F</i>0 production: Evidence from feedback perturbation","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America","topic":"Phonetics and Phonology Research","field":"Psychology","cited_by":288,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders","keywords":"Auditory feedback; Speech production; Perception; Fundamental frequency; Articulation (sociology); Acoustics; Control (management); Psychology; Audiology; Representation (politics); Computer science; Speech recognition; Physics; Medicine; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005525146,0.00008362797,0.0002258044,0.00001155005,0.0001093214,0.000006889186,0.0005219102,0.00008494426,0.003009234],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002194325,0.00004507941,0.0002221819,0.0002417231,0.00096973,0.00008306273,0.00005399466,0.0004443493,0.0000156562],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002794611,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007789293,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002701679,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.411257e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985404,0.000394536,0.000408851,0.00009707273,0.0004015902,0.0001575504],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983794,0.0007115661,0.0003205329,0.0003466841,0.0001939149,0.0000478885],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003016548,0.0009432635,0.001980889,0.00005535422,0.0009708041,0.000001569601,0.08935011,0.01805826,0.4117258,0.00001274403,0.364,0.1098846],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0044346,0.007719872,0.5914479,0.001390617,0.002825214,0.0006798962,0.05643172,0.2419958,0.05555393,0.02428886,0.01211616,0.001115317],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9618698,0.001286541,0.01464561,0.02113698,0.0005170422,0.0001717368,0.00001508022,0.000005984124,0.0003512093],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933049,0.00114038,0.003363097,0.000519446,0.0003856727,0.0000012022,7.310495e-7,0.0000089962,0.001275587],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5894671,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979022,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03615211682861011,"score_gpt":0.3153709031875885,"score_spread":0.2792187863589785,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}