{"id":"W2011414036","doi":"10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.452-453.1139","title":"Zigzag Carbon Nanotubes under Simple Torsion – Structural Mechanics Formulation","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Advanced materials research","topic":"Carbon Nanotubes in Composites","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Burman University","funders":"","keywords":"Torsion (gastropod); Zigzag; Materials science; Continuum mechanics; Stiffness; Structural mechanics; Bending stiffness; Carbon nanotube; Mechanics; Classical mechanics; Structural engineering; Composite material; Mathematics; Physics; Geometry; Engineering; Finite element method","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002120157,0.0002727416,0.0003713364,0.0002483182,0.0004102658,0.0002326816,0.0005184721,0.000187831,0.001253092],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000338271,0.0002402642,0.00005552714,0.0003976231,0.00009511144,0.0009504035,0.000625786,0.0001925188,0.0002085634],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003923745,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006219091,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002449242,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002234365,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960045,0.0004984546,0.0005123583,0.000490655,0.00115449,0.001339564],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982217,0.0003869728,0.0001205991,0.0007248667,0.0003099386,0.0002359028],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001938695,0.00003336322,0.0001649015,0.00005203246,0.000005556193,0.000001832706,0.0001860711,0.0002444879,0.9818253,0.01689894,0.00006466331,0.0003289929],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000461381,0.0001274793,0.0005286274,0.00003438125,0.000008761901,0.00001504368,0.0001306525,0.0003616857,0.9819807,0.01502939,0.001033101,0.0002887378],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.995258,0.0003965165,0.0002394968,0.00008952606,0.002623451,0.0006352379,0.00005440412,0.0001926586,0.0005106532],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9957269,0.00004250117,0.003126412,0.00004707925,0.0006900459,0.0000856792,0.00006406374,0.00006664136,0.0001506444],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002886915,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9996599,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04598340836851797,"score_gpt":0.369563479436525,"score_spread":0.323580071068007,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}