{"id":"W2011458510","doi":"10.1002/sia.3634","title":"Proposed ToF‐SIMS/XPS standardization methods for bonding wires in electronic packaging applications","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Surface and Interface Analysis","topic":"Ion-surface interactions and analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy; Standardization; Wire bonding; Secondary ion mass spectrometry; Characterization (materials science); Materials science; Mass spectrometry; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Nanotechnology; Computer science; Chemistry; Engineering; Chemical engineering; Telecommunications","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006014738,0.0002184025,0.0004183593,0.0004776804,0.0001562656,0.0001546478,0.000146141,0.0001090856,0.0001293975],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004291396,0.000213811,0.0002138202,0.001536833,0.00004004661,0.0004317974,0.00003049566,0.0003450286,0.000007387411],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001104186,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000295207,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00008961877,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001197784,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987024,0.00004939373,0.0004007522,0.0003505006,0.0001093656,0.0003875926],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992812,0.0001365125,0.00007678264,0.0003091361,0.0001261778,0.00007020937],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003088709,0.00007102357,0.01227229,0.0001077591,0.001626004,4.739135e-7,0.0007028528,0.3579414,0.5894014,0.002539549,0.0002998864,0.03500651],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003793424,0.00004428022,0.0005390196,0.00002827677,0.00114952,0.000001893735,0.0009985932,0.7742344,0.1416518,0.000933553,0.07954026,0.0004990677],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3808706,0.0007676882,0.617305,0.0001857484,0.00006765505,0.0002524955,0.00002014749,0.0001073793,0.000423291],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.974332,0.0003905414,0.02461862,0.00001578528,0.00003389695,0.00005270931,0.00004514277,0.00003442582,0.0004768748],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5934615,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8718958,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005315123715941087,"score_gpt":0.3205334445213631,"score_spread":0.315218320805422,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}