{"id":"W2011483940","doi":"10.1016/s0025-7125(05)70219-4","title":"A CONCISE REVIEW OF THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF CORONARY HEART DISEASE PREVENTION","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Medical Clinics of North America","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Panacea (medicine); Coronary heart disease; Intensive care medicine; Psychological intervention; Secondary prevention; Cost effectiveness; Health care; Disease; Primary prevention; Disease prevention; Cost–benefit analysis; Alternative medicine; Environmental health; Internal medicine; Nursing; Risk analysis (engineering); Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004369379,0.001285907,0.004649795,0.005388394,0.0002649834,0.001861422,0.001241383,0.001651381,0.003293328],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0129476,0.0006130005,0.002061775,0.007156373,0.000643817,0.001572795,0.0007052144,0.001791621,0.0005514959],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002474659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005239328,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007164043,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01704648,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9978417,0.0006664484,0.0005406703,0.0001550798,0.0007276207,0.00006843377],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9929328,0.004954027,0.0009783189,0.00007664539,0.0009365036,0.0001217036],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002921074,0.00007509476,0.0003998686,0.1863294,0.002045349,0.0001507868,0.00005342478,0.000728345,0.0002474768,0.00292442,0.07180468,0.7349491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005377189,0.0004531918,0.00888581,0.2362897,0.01292218,0.001635489,0.0001652267,0.000659332,0.0002886647,0.005349439,0.7327237,0.00008957129],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.00003589023,0.9992318,0.00005901491,0.0003600412,0.000133706,0.000008500299,0.0000435377,0.000002017755,0.0001254267],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.0005675724,0.9985758,0.0002419575,0.0003336626,0.0001606458,0.00001387683,0.00003821011,9.097728e-7,0.0000672876],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.007164043,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02310777,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4011407631004268,"score_gpt":0.5257570503098831,"score_spread":0.1246162872094563,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}