{"id":"W2011498489","doi":"10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.325-326.34","title":"Effect of Tool Wear on Quality of Carbon Fiber Reinforced Polymer Laminate during Edge Trimming","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Mechanics and Materials","topic":"Advanced machining processes and optimization","field":"Engineering","cited_by":19,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"École de Technologie Supérieure","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Consortium de Recherche et d’innovation en Aérospatiale au Québec","keywords":"Materials science; Composite material; Trimming; Delamination (geology); Surface roughness; Surface integrity; Carbon fiber reinforced polymer; Drilling; Tool wear; Fiber; Scanning electron microscope; Machining; Composite number; Mechanical engineering; Metallurgy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002173271,0.0001269064,0.0003041915,0.00004423213,0.00002216089,0.00001338441,0.00004784249,0.0000720009,0.00004557864],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001591325,0.0001107293,0.00001895837,0.00004951489,0.000005866371,0.00004591615,0.00003000056,0.00003702,0.000002568302],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009327779,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003088513,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002772568,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.617675e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993576,0.0000152934,0.0003046649,0.0001118357,0.00008082131,0.0001297874],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996691,0.00005646386,0.000107277,0.0001284627,0.0000156851,0.00002305434],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008725961,0.000002378598,2.787422e-7,0.0009511533,0.00001561851,1.049413e-7,0.0001050536,0.002565544,0.9692305,0.02525736,9.065042e-7,0.001783852],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005605777,0.00007834716,0.00001171574,0.00005284917,0.00001525916,3.494229e-7,0.00001851539,0.001163907,0.9975411,0.000438095,0.000004300306,0.0001149907],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9926171,0.00004897421,0.006326878,0.000001701632,0.0001151354,0.0002891053,0.000008594035,0.00005440945,0.0005380476],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989311,0.00008160973,0.0007714146,0.000004025528,0.00002272268,0.00004552745,0.000008946436,0.00002640476,0.0001083268],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0283106,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4515411,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.004656811226338243,"score_gpt":0.2170267708733372,"score_spread":0.212369959646999,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}