{"id":"W2011727948","doi":"10.1007/s00607-013-0361-x","title":"Comparing redundancy models for high availability middleware","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Computing","topic":"Software System Performance and Reliability","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University; Ericsson (Canada)","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Redundancy (engineering); Computer science; Provisioning; High availability; Fault tolerance; Distributed computing; Component (thermodynamics); Middleware (distributed applications); Single point of failure; Reliability engineering; Context (archaeology); Operating system; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008276904,0.0008501922,0.001001713,0.002347557,0.0006532762,0.00171197,0.002589033,0.001352785,0.003597381],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03640729,0.0005114517,0.001367703,0.001486306,0.001106046,0.003511075,0.001052219,0.001166141,0.0003570688],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.003107652,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001486978,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005872126,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004575476,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9960266,0.002240962,0.0001668473,0.0002693638,0.0008790821,0.0004171494],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9485838,0.04337943,0.001963357,0.003483805,0.002141703,0.0004478952],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001312593,0.0001944796,0.003329055,0.0003127836,0.0001868388,0.00008374025,0.0003243688,0.8994556,0.001262307,0.05731142,0.001667608,0.03455932],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006904642,0.0003081012,0.001409189,0.00003489518,0.0001370176,0.00005231837,0.0001460852,0.9605659,0.0006665,0.0359781,0.0006033653,0.0000295118],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6662725,0.003249506,0.3138949,0.001578713,0.0002367661,0.0001349107,0.0003979452,0.0009302392,0.01330449],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9810962,0.0003888947,0.01710065,0.00006714854,0.00005972719,0.00004740259,0.0001153478,0.0001345401,0.0009900075],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008276904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.043773,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03841983261104687,"score_gpt":0.2458708650413036,"score_spread":0.2074510324302567,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}