{"id":"W2011729896","doi":"10.1037/1040-3590.17.2.156","title":"Is More Better? Combining Actuarial Risk Scales to Predict Recidivism Among Adult Sex Offenders.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Assessment","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":139,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Addiction and Mental Health","funders":"","keywords":"Recidivism; Psychology; Logistic regression; Risk assessment; Sex offense; Sex offender; Sample (material); Scale (ratio); Poison control; Statistics; Actuarial science; Clinical psychology; Human factors and ergonomics; Sexual abuse; Medical emergency; Medicine; Computer science; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001179758,0.0009395321,0.001012181,0.0004057032,0.0004747222,0.0002071137,0.001325741,0.0007228962,0.003374596],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001295699,0.0008142286,0.0004613473,0.0007276089,0.0004397103,0.0003063412,0.0003083445,0.001679879,0.00151244],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003541815,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000268882,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001307634,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00005250491,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9927051,0.0007196087,0.001378683,0.002308385,0.001167549,0.00172065],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9960228,0.0004490158,0.0006292721,0.001812637,0.0001483835,0.0009379015],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004176778,0.0021707,0.2300052,0.00001238968,0.0004387461,0.00007040228,0.003656413,0.00002943898,0.0002752242,0.001645316,0.631143,0.1301355],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005301387,0.002136187,0.9490613,0.000114432,0.000152145,0.00008193294,0.002688107,0.0004090046,0.00009542388,0.002315511,0.03637037,0.001274221],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8623222,0.0001068598,0.007516386,0.01061423,0.0474382,0.001286039,0.000187836,0.0007035848,0.06982467],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9615232,0.00003098405,0.01682205,0.01464922,0.005456793,0.0004214396,0.00007141568,0.0001300837,0.0008947758],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7190561,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9994308,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03592538453505884,"score_gpt":0.3716691261527084,"score_spread":0.3357437416176496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}