{"id":"W2011729896","doi":"10.1037/1040-3590.17.2.156","title":"Is More Better? Combining Actuarial Risk Scales to Predict Recidivism Among Adult Sex Offenders.","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Psychological Assessment","topic":"Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending","field":"Psychology","cited_by":139,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Addiction and Mental Health","funders":"","keywords":"Recidivism; Psychology; Logistic regression; Risk assessment; Sex offense; Sex offender; Sample (material); Scale (ratio); Poison control; Statistics; Actuarial science; Clinical psychology; Human factors and ergonomics; Sexual abuse; Medical emergency; Medicine; Computer science; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008869179,0.0007186531,0.0007477422,0.00236677,0.0002805192,0.001145776,0.0004150953,0.000456775,0.001003095],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04829123,0.0002226451,0.0006548436,0.0008407487,0.00048851,0.001249624,0.0009692591,0.000933863,0.0003951604],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000188007,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003284969,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005274704,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001314451,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9950116,0.00327005,0.0003888836,0.0002598591,0.0009375509,0.0001320459],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9752401,0.01557677,0.004756382,0.001891316,0.001857582,0.0006779065],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004389535,0.0001644593,0.9149699,0.00004156952,0.0003285607,0.00004337595,0.0002865883,0.0009012485,0.0002327171,0.00008496811,0.0003725513,0.08213519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007012255,0.001891919,0.9548727,0.0001110545,0.0004827715,0.001024566,0.001396482,0.03570927,0.001492175,0.001827453,0.001043334,0.00007819439],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9940919,0.0005390855,0.003676632,0.0002800078,0.0000361875,0.00005645763,0.0001181466,0.00006916832,0.001132425],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9949865,0.000135849,0.004571804,0.00003719737,0.00002689795,0.0000208343,0.00008789721,0.000005499526,0.000127463],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008869179,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04690528,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03592538453505884,"score_gpt":0.3716691261527084,"score_spread":0.3357437416176496,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}