{"id":"W2011778471","doi":"10.3129/i10-113","title":"Analysis of the publication volume of Canadian ophthalmology departments from 2005 to 2009: a systematic review of the literature","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Canadian Journal of Ophthalmology","topic":"Ophthalmology and Visual Health Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Smiths Detection (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Impact factor; Medicine; Publication; Library science; Ophthalmology; MEDLINE; Family medicine; Political science; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01262727,0.00165801,0.01061973,0.03223611,0.001345701,0.003745812,0.003256855,0.0019833,0.002343397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07966531,0.001322713,0.01110801,0.05163935,0.00153973,0.002105388,0.002168686,0.001254378,0.0002331392],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01679593,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04158046,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.2442442,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.4834754,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9734492,0.003837721,0.01100908,0.002542512,0.008161195,0.001000287],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9082369,0.04283731,0.02694738,0.001436006,0.01872987,0.001812471],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001537025,0.00003426465,0.07758168,0.7816041,0.09649383,0.0005290284,0.001562673,0.0002519903,0.0003066197,0.0002291675,0.009416903,0.03045279],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001189303,0.0003373409,0.2695489,0.2945894,0.4044923,0.002000485,0.002070957,0.0002436806,0.0004639378,0.0003364609,0.02442971,0.000297436],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.01385818,0.9776135,0.0001062023,0.0004834249,0.000186365,0.0001612453,0.007221559,0.00001654104,0.0003529641],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.2295547,0.761505,0.001222479,0.001308729,0.0002397005,0.0006213381,0.00515417,0.00003587816,0.0003579616],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9873728,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4856451,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.13976230558378,"score_gpt":0.4439249064057779,"score_spread":0.3041626008219979,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}