{"id":"W2011837558","doi":"10.1088/0022-3727/41/24/245304","title":"Field emission calculations revisited with Murphy and Good theory: a new interpretation of the Fowler–Nordheim plot","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Physics D Applied Physics","topic":"Diamond and Carbon-based Materials Research","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Fonds Québécois de la Recherche sur la Nature et les Technologies","keywords":"Plot (graphics); Interpretation (philosophy); Field electron emission; Field (mathematics); Theoretical physics; Field theory (psychology); Statistical physics; Physics; Mathematical physics; Mathematics; Philosophy; Quantum mechanics; Statistics; Pure mathematics; Linguistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002573045,0.000138905,0.000304947,0.00002655901,0.0001323193,0.00004788571,0.0002483457,0.00004402833,0.00002585723],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003066321,0.00008461179,0.00008906863,0.0002604271,0.0001293326,0.000175757,0.00007554447,0.0001761693,0.00000289448],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002251901,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002327437,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001347185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":6.139094e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988279,0.00008709547,0.0003299491,0.0001368136,0.0004584498,0.0001598457],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988322,0.0001970398,0.0004746917,0.000214892,0.0001829254,0.00009827387],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004905504,0.0001367787,0.0001977306,0.00007734867,0.00004048293,0.000002099143,0.001123157,0.001016002,0.9645978,0.02701028,0.0003022585,0.005005551],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0007500447,0.0002402318,0.0003449269,0.0002348561,0.00007468351,0.00001096978,0.000109074,0.000578044,0.9497885,0.04768926,0.00005269299,0.0001266881],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9680774,0.00005152757,0.03052734,0.00007087208,0.00007342394,0.0001895078,0.00001028398,0.00001011658,0.0009895065],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.998548,0.00001940204,0.0009073912,0.00009150429,0.0003536635,0.000003847037,0.000001728108,0.00001861004,0.00005585713],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03047057,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3450369,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01394427614400429,"score_gpt":0.247348860699225,"score_spread":0.2334045845552207,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}