{"id":"W2011837623","doi":"10.1007/s10899-006-9039-z","title":"The South Oaks Gambling Screen-revised Adolescent (SOGS-RA) Revisited: A Cut-point Analysis","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Gambling Studies","topic":"Gambling Behavior and Treatments","field":"Psychology","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Dalhousie University","funders":"Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Canada Research Chairs","keywords":"Psychology; Cut-point; Clinical psychology; Developmental psychology; Psychiatry; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01028233,0.0007136848,0.001291012,0.003540003,0.0007723748,0.001639175,0.001826004,0.0009929026,0.001921995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01994708,0.0003149345,0.001654858,0.00198489,0.000705695,0.0009438053,0.001802227,0.00227614,0.0004560385],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007689694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001034949,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005503514,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01597645,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9952847,0.00199616,0.0005441758,0.0004207224,0.001531119,0.0002229807],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9884844,0.005593214,0.001541553,0.0005840771,0.003055194,0.000741657],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008554534,0.000127218,0.9781254,0.00009054862,0.0003524405,0.0001479046,0.0002861385,0.0002091889,0.0003688316,0.0007962263,0.001286366,0.01735434],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007277481,0.0004110998,0.9923139,0.0001203334,0.00041069,0.0004428978,0.001147877,0.002208715,0.0002881461,0.001137555,0.001428334,0.00001761011],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9878708,0.001330456,0.003560583,0.0006301856,0.0001313352,0.0002150452,0.001457115,0.00003270763,0.004771896],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9917547,0.0003164686,0.004409967,0.000196601,0.00003735423,0.0002017143,0.002341246,0.00003574816,0.0007062471],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01028233,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05437875,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1121283967896857,"score_gpt":0.4192404066221772,"score_spread":0.3071120098324914,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}