{"id":"W2011932408","doi":"10.1017/s1755020308080131","title":"MATHEMATICAL METHODS IN PHILOSOPHY EDITORS’ INTRODUCTION","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Review of Symbolic Logic","topic":"Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Philosophy of mathematics; Epistemology; Philosophy of logic; Philosophy of computer science; Mathematical practice; Mathematical logic; Dedekind cut; Philosophical logic; Foundations of mathematics; Philosophy; Philosophy of language; Modal logic; Computer science; Mathematics; Modal; Western philosophy; Pure mathematics; Algorithm; Metaphysics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002015449,0.0001510873,0.0005198997,0.00006950946,0.00007920881,0.000009921507,0.0009771498,0.00005694742,0.00009295994],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005632088,0.00008284463,0.0001495986,0.0006804715,0.0001747447,0.0001528182,0.000224169,0.0001987957,0.0001758896],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00003517836,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005557762,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000003653828,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":1.493871e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982508,0.00052712,0.0004811871,0.0002795087,0.0002343946,0.0002270248],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986281,0.0002510462,0.0001881702,0.0007937944,0.00008764258,0.00005128773],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002327253,0.000228734,0.00005933621,0.00266875,0.00002129572,0.000009990773,0.001158571,0.000003166997,0.0002002969,0.9387268,0.02469096,0.03222973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004222722,0.0002172885,0.001348227,0.003160052,0.00005878771,0.0006986446,0.00002085501,0.001558652,0.001291706,0.8541802,0.136563,0.000480392],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.001175644,0.3410607,0.4675445,0.04817638,0.006800525,0.002038265,0.000001537196,0.0003884376,0.132814],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1173178,0.3908484,0.4499833,0.00759979,0.03268987,0.00035705,0.000008887746,0.00006812129,0.001126775],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1316873,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3378306,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04543032424849617,"score_gpt":0.3364406164002181,"score_spread":0.2910102921517219,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}