{"id":"W2012046391","doi":"10.1109/tee.2010.5508814","title":"Building a Foundation for Multidisciplinary Design Using Case Studies","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Multidisciplinary approach; Foundation (evidence); Discipline; Work (physics); Engineering ethics; Computer science; Engineering management; Multidisciplinary team; Engineering; Mechanical engineering; Sociology; Political science; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04943814,0.001791586,0.001227248,0.009561995,0.005672753,0.01077951,0.004985538,0.004991613,0.008571469],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04493044,0.001534755,0.001247989,0.003377341,0.01228809,0.01485785,0.01266645,0.00562463,0.001589572],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004820128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007483747,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001997848,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003856175,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9606737,0.02993628,0.002269211,0.001800578,0.004373268,0.0009468903],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9219157,0.05776801,0.002258665,0.01017483,0.006001457,0.001881307],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003697678,0.0008047454,0.002689272,0.001031058,0.00004642777,0.001249277,0.02050529,0.00824137,0.001408375,0.8432535,0.004511942,0.1162217],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001129958,0.0003366272,0.00116855,0.006181571,0.00005050062,0.001037002,0.02158248,0.0230814,0.002280294,0.7488486,0.1951805,0.000139489],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02846833,0.001631132,0.880073,0.01137101,0.0003965276,0.003226852,0.0001555421,0.0003959261,0.07428166],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1264272,0.001154455,0.8672942,0.0004158508,0.00004506574,0.002122931,0.0001730148,0.00007301383,0.002294274],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04943814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.261457,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.142083778132193,"score_gpt":0.4175079019525437,"score_spread":0.2754241238203506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}