{"id":"W2012070999","doi":"10.2118/142854-pa","title":"Assessing Well-Integrity Risk: A Qualitative Model","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SPE Drilling & Completion","topic":"Risk and Safety Analysis","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":34,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"ConocoPhillips (Canada)","funders":"ConocoPhillips","keywords":"Brainstorming; Failure mode and effects analysis; Risk analysis (engineering); Risk assessment; Ranking (information retrieval); Process (computing); Risk management; Computer science; Fault tree analysis; Containment (computer programming); Engineering; Reliability engineering; Business; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009694399,0.0001813516,0.0004193146,0.0002875613,0.000585577,0.0003924583,0.0004069253,0.0001069275,0.0004050378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002862275,0.0001381745,0.0003015079,0.0008295994,0.0001188618,0.001207398,0.00008423523,0.0004246277,0.00140141],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009475277,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004562415,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003742121,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00008204874,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9959272,0.001111075,0.0007362641,0.0004289203,0.001371928,0.0004246868],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9962463,0.002118472,0.0004936531,0.0005377181,0.0004225576,0.0001813209],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002450253,0.0009101938,0.2447804,0.00002500098,0.0003408389,0.000006057222,0.1232255,0.3411236,0.004935117,0.09819718,0.01430572,0.1719054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001883775,0.00001705656,0.03618781,0.00001912255,0.00006454586,0.000002552578,0.01164807,0.7548213,0.0001915246,0.1920261,0.004581236,0.0002523446],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4221952,0.0001420404,0.5696911,0.0007242145,0.0002492599,0.00006238133,0.00001361532,0.0000481528,0.006874097],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9609749,0.0001135828,0.03802524,0.00009301104,0.0002699265,0.000003824493,0.000024192,0.00001232228,0.0004829786],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5387797,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9993761,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.343738488006651,"score_gpt":0.5000031668834591,"score_spread":0.1562646788768082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}