{"id":"W2012073793","doi":"10.1088/0031-9155/54/15/n01","title":"Cone beam computerized tomography: the effect of calibration of the Hounsfield unit number to electron density on dose calculation accuracy for adaptive radiation therapy","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physics in Medicine and Biology","topic":"Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":167,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Manitoba; CancerCare Manitoba","funders":"","keywords":"Imaging phantom; Hounsfield scale; Calibration; Nuclear medicine; Cone beam computed tomography; Materials science; Calibration curve; Dosimetry; Biomedical engineering; Optics; Medicine; Physics; Computed tomography; Mathematics; Radiology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.005853769,0.0005698069,0.0003590439,0.0006834353,0.000242939,0.0008746434,0.0006497335,0.0007351906,0.0009365183],"category_scores_gemma":[0.024258,0.0005279814,0.0002820497,0.0007932081,0.0004439263,0.000803332,0.0004866962,0.0005872888,0.0003170312],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006782832,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004330449,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002068892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001956142,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9945792,0.002099881,0.0002653,0.0005056827,0.002459876,0.00009002924],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.968541,0.02509516,0.002114706,0.001386557,0.002705398,0.0001570814],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00396708,0.0002101447,0.09808818,0.0008399445,0.0003497288,0.0002493788,0.000614929,0.02737327,0.5164149,0.0009020477,0.001181862,0.3498086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007005217,0.002116569,0.2483419,0.0001450102,0.0003689866,0.002480655,0.00009898017,0.08664213,0.6538618,0.0004963903,0.005207045,0.0001705001],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7229708,0.01604661,0.2528649,0.0007481893,0.0001449111,0.0001739042,0.0004117249,0.002037069,0.004602022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9263261,0.002700297,0.06821933,0.0003135008,0.0000431576,0.00004824359,0.00031678,0.0005475118,0.001485078],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005853769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03095806,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04720108200579241,"score_gpt":0.3734982356728234,"score_spread":0.3262971536670309,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}