{"id":"W2012206031","doi":"10.1136/jech-2013-203098.17","title":"DEVELOPING AND TESTING A TOOL FOR ASSESSING PHARMACOECONOMIC EVALUATIONS","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Epidemiology & Community Health","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Formulary; Reimbursement; Medicine; Quality (philosophy); Pharmacoeconomics; Listing (finance); Transparency (behavior); Economic evaluation; Critical appraisal; Actuarial science; Family medicine; Alternative medicine; Computer science; Health care; Finance; Intensive care medicine; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.3410229,0.002017618,0.003023728,0.02249201,0.001699799,0.007911973,0.002877552,0.002011931,0.005698716],"category_scores_gemma":[0.5453573,0.001390268,0.007016548,0.01584799,0.001977969,0.009891682,0.005872274,0.002618879,0.001377729],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008738074,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01590326,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001856534,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002387115,"domain_scores_codex":[0.6608034,0.1739471,0.09801374,0.007504989,0.05529607,0.004434765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.2677161,0.5624861,0.04197586,0.01957283,0.1060657,0.002183449],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002142507,0.001298336,0.1218876,0.01595877,0.001865327,0.0002671658,0.009250231,0.00632844,0.001814198,0.01115816,0.02473244,0.8032967],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005657877,0.01527121,0.5405518,0.03086476,0.005360046,0.001693134,0.02748588,0.1065421,0.02317017,0.05239971,0.1893585,0.001644764],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.2896777,0.003514786,0.4821972,0.006920685,0.001376669,0.1490678,0.01840608,0.006053295,0.0427858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1983567,0.0009019648,0.7172063,0.0005972368,0.0001196236,0.07825971,0.003400529,0.0001752639,0.0009827294],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3410229,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8126361,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.7950656200516121,"score_gpt":0.5951736751873324,"score_spread":0.1998919448642796,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}