{"id":"W2012307583","doi":"10.3189/172756404781815266","title":"Hierarchy theory as a conceptual framework for scale issues in avalanche forecast modeling","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Glaciology","topic":"Landslides and related hazards","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of British Columbia; Montana State University","keywords":"Hierarchy; Scale (ratio); Computer science; Phenomenon; Conceptual framework; Data science; Geography; Epistemology; Cartography; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004647623,0.0001039764,0.0002327274,0.00003637235,0.00004185897,0.000004150425,0.0001774943,0.0002475056,0.000406403],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001421371,0.0000784893,0.00008561059,0.00009277747,0.0003960577,0.00007459058,0.00008107122,0.0001838213,0.00008228492],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001982618,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001657929,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001995138,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006108978,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999062,0.00006407234,0.0002374435,0.000226329,0.00008769155,0.0003224497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995753,0.0001376883,0.00006061124,0.0001556415,0.00001347183,0.00005726726],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002552602,0.0006627982,0.05001934,0.0000582576,0.0001675035,0.00004214106,0.03937814,0.2835291,0.00505862,0.5894092,0.001423639,0.0276987],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000671988,0.0005105372,0.001075506,0.00006007673,0.000008120255,0.00001099634,0.0008489126,0.002583453,0.003696796,0.9868801,0.003492038,0.0001615166],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9825977,0.0005882288,0.01220667,0.002396097,0.00009799642,0.0001933487,0.000008823746,0.00001576965,0.001895335],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9936532,0.0003758407,0.004806234,0.0009248485,0.00005663113,0.00002146361,0.000007944144,0.00001114696,0.0001426822],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3974709,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4449828,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03967765678565059,"score_gpt":0.324176287412088,"score_spread":0.2844986306264374,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}