{"id":"W2012368849","doi":"10.5558/tfc2011-071","title":"The carbon neutrality assumption for forest bioenergy: A case study for northwestern Ontario","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Forestry Chronicle","topic":"Bioenergy crop production and management","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":35,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Ontario Forest Research Institute","funders":"Ministry of Natural Resources","keywords":"Pellets; Greenhouse gas; Carbon neutrality; Environmental science; Carbon fibers; Bioenergy; Coal; Forest management; Forestry; Agroforestry; Biomass (ecology); Biofuel; Agronomy; Geography; Ecology; Mathematics; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004728198,0.0001354606,0.0001012703,0.000004615672,0.0007991303,0.00007746905,0.0003066503,0.00004786632,0.00002284509],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000006558685,0.00004054237,0.0001114143,0.00008972269,0.00009973863,0.00007057547,0.00008692503,0.00007822704,0.000002198559],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009364086,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002060498,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1975768,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9248751,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990438,0.00004072886,0.0002028264,0.0002820592,0.0001027593,0.0003278838],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999513,0.0000855596,0.0001021224,0.0001849699,0.00006072245,0.00005361453],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003758512,0.005098634,0.4981096,0.000138036,0.001249361,0.0001995004,0.03062103,0.001096744,0.009880527,0.01936621,0.008637631,0.4218442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001965953,0.004076307,0.7582098,0.00001228274,0.0002539909,0.000187885,0.0174751,0.001562177,0.002602762,0.003313031,0.2097551,0.000585549],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9973109,0.00007419162,0.00001507246,0.0008370901,0.0003505946,0.001225018,0.00001156188,0.00005816524,0.0001174304],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.997627,0.00000835106,0.00002270233,0.00008403054,0.0003082904,0.0004680719,0.00001810683,0.000002153486,0.001461269],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7272983,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8077666,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06409877316884531,"score_gpt":0.2508689602315902,"score_spread":0.1867701870627449,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}