{"id":"W2012452592","doi":"10.1109/tpc.2010.2052845","title":"Improving Professional Writing for Lay Practitioners: A Rhetorical Approach","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Concordia University","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Professional communication; Literacy; Context (archaeology); Technical writing; Underpinning; Professional writing; Process (computing); Technical communication; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Knowledge management; Medical education; Pedagogy; World Wide Web; Engineering; Medicine; Linguistics; Higher education; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03490044,0.001486263,0.000860443,0.004281738,0.005247389,0.0116152,0.003819903,0.004093313,0.006152802],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05648561,0.0008872117,0.000652383,0.001474258,0.007156285,0.009434997,0.00967998,0.005589087,0.002152489],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002412025,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005683942,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002178491,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005334574,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9676659,0.0251378,0.001084954,0.001012124,0.004362955,0.000736393],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9238996,0.06226663,0.002601563,0.002355652,0.006689671,0.00218698],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001596557,0.001143593,0.001920267,0.005447465,0.00005216454,0.001008695,0.2366704,0.001286534,0.01885844,0.1223952,0.02189288,0.5891646],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002561769,0.001158634,0.002700085,0.006814762,0.0001499827,0.002616499,0.2102173,0.007120048,0.01844754,0.1581195,0.5922367,0.0001627132],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.07277992,0.008943178,0.7420318,0.05752493,0.002327236,0.002511812,0.00008624775,0.001610023,0.1121849],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3263495,0.007343919,0.6331024,0.00536982,0.0009945912,0.002408867,0.0001745879,0.0004579039,0.02379841],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03490044,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1845734,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04778001049490112,"score_gpt":0.3348872564590651,"score_spread":0.287107245964164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}