{"id":"W2012452592","doi":"10.1109/tpc.2010.2052845","title":"Improving Professional Writing for Lay Practitioners: A Rhetorical Approach","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication","topic":"Discourse Analysis in Language Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Concordia University","keywords":"Rhetorical question; Professional communication; Literacy; Context (archaeology); Technical writing; Underpinning; Professional writing; Process (computing); Technical communication; Computer science; Engineering ethics; Psychology; Knowledge management; Medical education; Pedagogy; World Wide Web; Engineering; Medicine; Linguistics; Higher education; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007339221,0.0002229496,0.0002392077,0.0001949169,0.002495136,0.0001456413,0.0004263588,0.0001291651,0.000809567],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006711517,0.0001825581,0.0002137564,0.00009601971,0.0003430273,0.0006447632,0.00001187375,0.001026749,0.00004161525],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006120253,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001236189,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001029483,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000576986,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9983389,0.0001956368,0.0004488068,0.0003280845,0.0004044567,0.0002840852],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978291,0.0007077088,0.0002717822,0.0006449588,0.0004707579,0.00007573644],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0008696812,0.008772083,0.00007112171,0.0004284878,0.0009221475,0.000002517259,0.06804943,0.0007351879,0.02171424,0.7858025,0.01736999,0.0952626],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01406289,0.001528798,0.0006888725,0.002626357,0.003112186,0.0001017178,0.4712161,0.1024386,0.02630486,0.04297124,0.3281001,0.006848269],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2045191,0.0008049306,0.5916376,0.01876284,0.02129814,0.006642775,0.00101506,0.00169397,0.1536257],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9766577,0.00001625126,0.01193217,0.0003455408,0.0004729891,0.001201136,0.0001292704,0.0000413803,0.009203486],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7721387,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988035,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04778001049490112,"score_gpt":0.3348872564590651,"score_spread":0.287107245964164,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}