{"id":"W2012491320","doi":"10.1002/qua.22761","title":"Multireference coupled‐cluster methods for ground and low‐lying excited states. A benchmark illustration on CH <sup>+</sup> potentials","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Quantum Chemistry","topic":"Advanced Chemical Physics Studies","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Coupled cluster; Excited state; Complete active space; Atomic physics; Singlet state; Configuration interaction; Ab initio; Chemistry; Full configuration interaction; Cluster (spacecraft); Amplitude; Physics; Computational chemistry; Quantum mechanics; Molecule; Density functional theory; Basis set","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002562203,0.001324496,0.001828955,0.001719851,0.001558973,0.001071492,0.003807794,0.002000615,0.006018639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003669994,0.0004171056,0.001071003,0.003998952,0.0006151525,0.001122186,0.001490382,0.001437668,0.001187985],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002099209,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002066302,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01344731,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0173929,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989601,0.0006333214,0.00003305303,0.00004122982,0.0002626127,0.0000696027],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9979625,0.0012012,0.00006887736,0.0002892876,0.0004081323,0.00007005329],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001599555,0.00009165789,0.0003414398,0.0003888837,0.00008667805,0.000152196,0.00008801952,0.8590648,0.001114686,0.09595057,0.00730057,0.03526054],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001935071,0.00002507758,0.0001541292,0.00001487486,0.000006363547,0.00001237957,0.00002206718,0.9881623,0.0005446886,0.00983802,0.001187563,0.00001314107],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2157258,0.008379198,0.6784488,0.002022153,0.0004040566,0.0006283981,0.003882513,0.003601084,0.08690802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6947546,0.00143168,0.2899511,0.0002791092,0.00009918944,0.001374715,0.002326426,0.0008184213,0.008964758],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01344731,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02673811,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02127474888766835,"score_gpt":0.3414052681903166,"score_spread":0.3201305193026482,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}